Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Employers can structure PRS to retain talent, save tax


KUALA LUMPUR (June 6): Employers can take full advantage of the tax benefits for their contribution to employee remuneration, while retaining their talent pool, by participating in private retirement schemes (PRS) that are set to come into the local market as early as October.

Jason Chong, CEO of Manulife Asset Management (M) Sdn Bhd, said PRS can be structured to become a talent retention tool for the employer. "Vesting is one way. I give you an additional 3%, but if you leave within two years, you don't get anything. It can be a progressive scale. We hear about brain drain all the time… people going to work in Singapore and Hong Kong. This is one way of retaining talent in Malaysia," Chong said on Tuesday.

Moreover, the Malaysian tax structure allows employers to claim tax deductions of up to 19% of their employee remuneration under employment benefits, which is above the current statutory contribution rate of 12% or 13% to the Employees Provident Fund (EPF).

"Currently, employers give 12% [or 13% for employees whose monthly salary is below RM5,000], so potentially there is another 7% that they can contribute and still get tax deductions," Chong said, pointing out that statistics show most retirees using up an average of RM150,000 from their EPF savings within the first three to five years of retirement.

While tax benefits could help spur the initial take-up of PRS, Chong reckons individuals themselves need to understand what PRS is and whether the options available could help shore up savings for their old age. "There will need to be a lot of education on benefits, but that's part of the business plan."

Individuals can claim RM3,000 tax relief a year on voluntary contributions to PRS.

Manulife Unit Trust Bhd was among the eight Securities Commission Malaysia-approved PRS providers announced on April 5. The others were AmInvestment Management Sdn Bhd, American International Assurance Bhd (AIA), CIMB-Principal Asset Management Bhd, Hwang Investment Management Bhd, ING Funds Bhd, Public Mutual Bhd and RHB Investment Management Sdn Bhd.

Basic PRS products should come into the market from October this year, as the providers were given six months to come up with a plan for approval, Chong said. Market conditions should not affect the roll-out as the product is for the long term, he added.

The common questions that come up are: Can the PRS beat the EPF in terms of returns? And what happens if the fund ends up giving lower returns than the EPF?

"It depends on your risk appetite, growth, moderate or conservative. If you're aggressive and go for the more aggressive growth products, then you should. But if you're conservative, you go for the more conservative funds," Chong said.

"Part of the education process is to not look so much at the short-term performance, but at the long-term performance… sometimes [due to market conditions], you can't look over the one-year basis. You've got to look over the medium term," said Chong, who is not expecting a strong take-up until there is more awareness about PRS.

Studies have shown that putting money with Manulife funds delivers 200 basis points more returns a year on average over a 10-year period, net of management fees, than if one were to invest their money themselves, said Robert Boyda, head of Global Asset Allocation and senior portfolio manager for Manulife Asset Management in the US, where Manulife is the No 1 private pension scheme provider. It is also No 1 in Canada and No 2 in Hong Kong and Indonesia.

The difference of having funds professionally managed, Chong added, minimises the paralysis of herd mentality that individual investors are often caught in.

"When you invest yourself, you are hit by sentiment, you become emotional. When the market crashes, you panic and you sell. When the market rebounds, you miss the rebound because you're scared to jump back in wondering if [the uptick] is sustainable. A pension fund will take a long-term view and sit through [the shorter-term volatilities]," he said.

Sharing her experience in the Hong Kong market, Luiza Rosa Hung, CEO Manulife Provident Funds Trust Co Ltd, said the facilitation of an automatic enrolment on the private retirement scheme plans, while allowing the choice to opt out, could increase the chances of an individual saving more for their retirement. To ensure sustainability, the process for wage earners to make additional voluntary contributions should be simple, she added.

Source: This story appeared in The Edge Financial Daily on June 6, 2012

Tuesday, June 26, 2012

避免爭議‧單身人士應立遺囑


一個單身的成年人,如果去世前沒有立遺囑同時父母已不在世、在沒有配偶、子女的情況下,根據遺產法令的分配,遺產歸兄弟姐妹平分。 

一名自稱是單身的讀者說,她名下有一些資產,例如房屋、單位信託、銀行存款,汽車等等,她想知道,如果是亁兒子,可以直接割名給他嗎?
__________________________________________________________________________________
單身的女姓朋友應該立遺囑,立了遺囑,可以將財產分配好,列明其中一部份財產將分給亁兒子,假如沒有立遺囑,萬一不在世,遺產將根據遺產法令分配。

林若輝律師說,一個單身的成年人,如果去世前沒有立遺囑,同時父母已不在世、在沒有配偶、子女的情況下,根據遺產法令的分配,遺產歸兄弟姐妹平分。

財務顧問認為,單身的成年人,不論財富多少,都應該立遺囑,立遺囑的時候,可以依據個人的意願進行遺產分配,譬如可以分配給母校、宗教組織、社會團體,侄兒、侄女、外甥等,表明分配同樣或不同數目的款項。

我們有遇到這樣的情況,就是單身的成年人去世,生前沒有立遺囑,財產說多不多、說少不少,其兄弟姐妹也過得去,他們因沒有時間處理,沒有打理其遺產。

另外一種情況是,儘管是以遺產法令進行分配,兄弟姐妹平分,可是,兄弟姐妹之間各說各話、互不相讓,認為自己應該分多一些,因為無法達致協議,鬧到不歡而散,結果也是沒有人負責處理,遺產最後只好歸政府。

一個人在世時,若立了遺囑,可以根據自己的判斷、意願來分配自己的財產,其他人不能有任何異議

Source: (星洲日報/投資致富‧產業問診室)